A recent hypothesis [][] even states that both robust and accurate models are impossible, i.e., adversarial robustness and generalization are conflicting goals. Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracy | Papers With Code Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracy ICLR 2019 • Dimitris Tsipras • Shibani Santurkar • Logan Engstrom • Alexander Turner • Aleksander Madry We show that there may exist an inherent tension between the goal of adversarial robustness and that of standard generalization. 438 * 2018: Adversarial examples are not bugs, they are features. Models trained on highly saturated CIFAR10 are quite robust and the gap between robust accuracy and robustness w.r.t. 43 ETHZ Zürich, Switzerland Google Zürich. Use, Smithsonian Authors: Dimitris Tsipras, Shibani Santurkar, Logan Engstrom, Alexander Turner, Aleksander Madry (Submitted on 30 May 2018 , last revised 9 Sep 2019 (this version, v5)) Abstract: We show that there may exist an inherent tension between the goal of adversarial robustness and that of standard generalization. Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracy, Dimitris Tsipras, Shibani Santurkar, Logan Engstrom, Alexander Turner, Aleksander Mądry. Abstract: Current techniques in machine learning are so far are unable to learn classifiers that are robust to adversarial perturbations. Schmidt L, Santurkar S, Tsipras D, Talwar K, ... Chen P, Gao Y (2018) Is robustness the cost of accuracy?—a comprehensive study on the robustness of 18 deep image classification models. Statistically, robustness can be be at odds with accuracy when no assumptions are made on the data distri- bution (Tsipras et al., 2019). However, they are able to learn non-robust classifiers with very high accuracy, even in the presence of random perturbations. Title:Adversarial Robustness May Be at Odds With Simplicity. RAIN: Robust and Accurate Classification Networks with Randomization and Enhancement. Logan Engstrom*, Brandon Tran*, Dimitris Tsipras*, Ludwig Schmidt, and Aleksander Mądry. How Does Batch Normalization Help Optimization? 13/29 c Stanley Chan 2020. We demonstrate that this trade-off between the standard accuracy of a model and its robustness to adversarial perturbations provably exists in a fairly simple and natural setting. Specifically, training robust models may not only be more resource-consuming, but also lead to a reduction of standard accuracy. We show that neither robustness nor non-robustness are monotonic with changing the number of bits for the representation and, also, neither are preserved by quantization from a real-numbered network. We built a … x��ْ#�u����l+0l�,�!rD��I�"[�d�/�ݘn�XZX8:쇴��7����,Ԓ�i-E�d��n�����I:���x��a�Ϧ�y9~���'㢘���J�Ӽ�n��f��%W��W�ߍ?�'�4���}��r�%ٸ�'�YU��7�^�M�����Ɠ��n�b�����]��o_���b6�|�_moW�����s�b\���~q��ڽ~n�,�o��m������8e���]a�Ŷ�����~q������|=XiY%�:�zK�Tp�R��y�j�pYV�:��e�L��,������b{������r6M�z|};.��+���L�l�� ���S��I��_��w�oG,# Specifically, training robust models may not only be more resource-consuming, but also lead to a reduction of standard accuracy. Code for "Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracy" Jupyter Notebook 13 81 2 1 Updated Nov 13, 2020. mnist_challenge A challenge to explore adversarial robustness of neural networks on MNIST. Dimitris Tsipras, Shibani Santurkar, Logan Engstrom, Alexander Turner, Aleksander Madry We show that there may exist an inherent tension between the goal of adversarial robustness and that of standard generalization. Proceedings of the International Conference on Representation Learning (ICLR …, 2018. Robustness may be at odds with accuracy. Mark. Specifically, training robust models may not only be more resource-consuming, but also lead to a reduction of standard accuracy. Specifically, training robust models may not only be more resource-consuming, but also lead to a reduction of standard accuracy. is how to trade off adversarial robustness against natural accuracy. Adversarial Robustness through Local Linearization, ... Robustness may be at odds with accuracy, Tsipras et al., NeurIPS 2018. (2019) showed that robustness may be at odds with accuracy, and a principled trade-off was studied by Zhang et al. This bound implies that if p < 1, as standard accuracy approaches 100% (d!0), adversarial accuracy falls to 0%. Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracy Dimitris Tsipras, Shibani Santurkar, Logan Engstrom, Alexander Turner, Aleksander Madry (Submitted on 30 May 2018 (v1), last revised 11 Oct 2018 (this version, v3)) We show that there exists an inherent tension between the goal of adversarial robustness and that of standard generalization. D Tsipras, S Santurkar, L Engstrom, A Turner, A Madry. ICLR 2019. ICLR 2019. ]��u|| /]��,��D�.�i>OP�-�{0��Û��ۃ�S���j{������.,gX�W�C�T�oL�����٬���"+0~�>>�N�Fj��ae��}����&. 44 Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; Computer Science - Neural and Evolutionary Computing. This has led to an empirical line of work on adversarial defense that incorporates var-ious kinds of assumptions (Su et al.,2018;Kurakin et al., 2017). An Unexplained Phenomenon Models trained to be more robust to adversarial attacks seem to exhibit ’interpretable’ saliency maps1 Original Image Saliency map of a robusti ed ResNet50 This phenomenon has a remarkably simple explanation! arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.12152, 2018. Furthermore, recent works Tsipras et al. Tsipras D, Santurkar S, Engstrom L, Turner A, Madry A (2019) Robustness may be at odds with accuracy. Further, we argue that this phenomenon is a consequence of robust classifiers learning fundamentally different feature representations than standard classifiers. We demonstrate that this trade-off between the standard accuracy of a model and its robustness to adversarial perturbations provably exists in a fairly simple and natural setting. Statistically, robustness can be be at odds with accuracy when no assumptions are made on the data distri-bution (Tsipras et al.,2019). Logan Engstrom, Brandon Tran, Dimitris Tsipras, Ludwig Schmidt, Aleksander Madry: Exploring the Landscape of Spatial Robustness. ... Tsipras D, Santurkar S, Engstrom L, Turner A, Madry A (2019) Robustness may be at odds with accuracy. We show that there may exist an inherent tension between the goal of adversarial robustness and that of standard generalization. Statistically, robustness can be be at odds with accuracy when no assumptions are made on the data distri-bution (Tsipras et al., 2019). Theorem 2.1(Robustness-accuracy trade-off). For this reason, we introduce a verification method for quantized neural networks which, using SMT solving over bit-vectors, accounts for their exact, bit-precise semantics. Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracy. l^�&���0sT Dimitris Tsipras, Shibani Santurkar, Logan Engstrom, Alexander Turner, Aleksander Madry: Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracy. ICLR 2019. Specifically, training robust models may not only be more resource-consuming, but also lead to a reduction of standard accuracy. found ... With unperturbed data, standard training achieves the highest accuracy and all defense techniques slightly degrade the performance. Dimitris Tsipras. ICLR 2019. (2019) claim that existence of adversarial examples are due to standard training methods that rely on highly predictive but non-robust features, and make connections between robustness and explainability. How Does Batch Normalization Help Optimization?, [blogpost, video] Shibani Santurkar, Dimitris Tsipras, Andrew … Notice, Smithsonian Terms of In: International conference on learning representations. %��������� We show that Parseval networks match the state-of-the-art in terms of accuracy on CIFAR-10/100 and Street View House Numbers (SVHN) while being more robust … Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracy We show that there may exist an inherent tension between the goal of adversarial robustness and that of standard generalization. Agreement NNX16AC86A, Is ADS down? Authors:Preetum Nakkiran. (2019), which de- arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.12152, 2018. Abstract: Current techniques in machine learning are so far are unable to learn classifiers that are robust to adversarial perturbations. .. predictions is due to lower clean accuracy. Gradient Regularization Improves Accuracy of Discriminate Models Stochastic Gradient Descent on Separable Data: Exact Convergence with a Fixed Learning Rate Convergence of Gradient Descent on Separable Data The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Data CINIC-10 Is Not ImageNet or CIFAR-10 BabyAI: First Steps Towards Grounded Language Learning With a Human In the Loop Theory … Aleksander Madry [0] international conference on learning representations, 2019. 1. Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2019 ROBUSTNESS MAY BE AT ODDS WITH ACCURACY Dimitris Tsipras∗ , Shibani Santurkar∗ , Logan Engstrom∗ , Alexander Turner, Aleksander M ˛ adry Massachusetts Institute of Technology {tsipras,shibani,engstrom,turneram,madry}@mit.edu ABSTRACT We show that there exists an inherent tension between the goal of adversarial robustness and that of … Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 125-136, 2019. .. Dimitris Tsipras, Shibani Santurkar, Logan Engstrom, Alexander Turner, and Aleksander Madry. The ADS is operated by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory under NASA Cooperative Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracy We show that there may exist an inherent tension between the goal of adversarial robustness and that of standard generalization. In contrast, In MNIST variants, the robustness w.r.t. These differences, in particular, seem to result in unexpected benefits: the representations learned by robust models tend to align better with salient data characteristics and human perception. Prior Convictions: Black-Box Adversarial Attacks with Bandits and Priors , Andrew Ilyas, Logan Engstrom, Aleksander Mądry. predictions is always almost the same as robust accuracy, indicating that drops in robust accuracy is due to adversarial vulnerability. the robustness of deep networks. EI. Tsipras et al. ICLR 2019 • Dimitris Tsipras • Shibani Santurkar • Logan Engstrom • Alexander Turner • ... We show that there may exist an inherent tension between the goal of adversarial robustness and that of standard generalization. Moreover, $\textit{there is a quantitative trade-off between robustness and standard accuracy among simple classifiers. accuracy. Cited by: 20 | Bibtex | Views 27 | Links. Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracy Dimitris Tsipras*, Shibani Santurkar*, Logan Engstrom*, Alexander Turner, Aleksander Madry https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.12152 We show that adversarial robustness often inevitablely results in accuracy loss. This may focus the salience map on robust features only, as SmoothGrad highlights the important features in common over a small neighborhood. (or is it just me...), Smithsonian Privacy 43 ETHZ Zürich, Switzerland Google Zürich. Models trained to be more robust to adversarial attacks seem to exhibit ’interpretable’ saliency maps1 Original Image Saliency map of a robusti ed ResNet50 This phenomenon has a remarkably simple explanation! A Ilyas, S Santurkar, D Tsipras, L Engstrom, B Tran, A Madry. Title: Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracy. moosavi.sm@gmail.com smoosavi.me. %PDF-1.3 Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracy Dimitris Tsipras*, Shibani Santurkar*, Logan Engstrom*, Alexander Turner, Aleksander Madry ICLR 2019. Robust Training of Graph Convolutional Networks via ... attains improved robustness and accuracy by respecting the latent manifold of ... Tsipras et al. D Tsipras; S Santurkar; L Engstrom; A Turner ; A Madry; Adversarial training for free! 425 * 2018: Adversarial examples are not bugs, they are features. Astrophysical Observatory. … 44 Interested in my research? Robustness may be at odds with accuracy. YR��r~�?��d��F�h�M�ar:������I:�%y�� ��z�)M�)����_���b���]YH�bZ�@rH9i]L�z �����6@����X�p�+!�y4̲zZ� ��44,���ʊlZg|��}�81�x��կ�Ӫ��yVB��O�0��)���������bـ�i��_�N�n��[ �-,A+R����-I�����_'�l���g崞e�M>�9Q`!r�Ox�L��%۰VV�㢮��,�cx����bTI� �L5Y�-���kԋ���e���3��[ 3 EPFL Lausanne, ... last column measures the minimum average pixel level distortion necessary to reach 0% accuracy on the training set. However, they are able to learn non-robust classifiers with very high accuracy, even in the presence of random perturbations. Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracy Dimitris Tsipras*, Shibani Santurkar*, Logan Engstrom*, Alexander Turner, Aleksander Mądry ICLR 2019 How Does Batch Normalization Help Optimization? ��& ��RTBҪD_W]2��)>�x�O����hx���/�{gnݟVw��N3? ∙ 0 ∙ share . Title:Adversarial Robustness May Be at Odds With Simplicity. ’ 3. This means that a robustness test was performed at a late stage in the method validation since interlaboratory studies are performed in the final stage. There is another very interesting paper Tsipras et al., Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracy, arXiv: 1805.12152 Some observations are quite intriguing. In: International conference on learning representations. 1Tsipras et al, 2019: ’Robustness may be at odds with accuracy. Shibani Santurkar [0] Logan Engstrom [0] Alexander Turner. Deep networks were recently suggested to face the odds between accuracy (on clean natural images) and robustness (on adversarially perturbed images) (Tsipras et al., 2019). The distortion is measure by ... Robustness may be at odds with accuracy, Tsipras et al., NeurIPS 2018. Statistically, robustness can be be at odds with accuracy when no assumptions are made on the data distri-bution (Tsipras et al.,2019). Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracy, Dimitris Tsipras, Shibani Santurkar, Logan Engstrom, Alexander Turner, Aleksander Mądry. 04/24/2020 ∙ by Jiawei Du, et al. 这篇说adbersarial training会伤害classification accuracy. D Tsipras, S Santurkar, L Engstrom, A Turner, A Madry. 4 0 obj 1Tsipras et al, 2019: ’Robustness may be at odds with accuracy.’ 3. Full Text. Figure 2 qualitatively compares SmoothGrad and simple gradients. (2019); Ilyas et al. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 125-136, 2019. A Ilyas, S Santurkar, D Tsipras, L Engstrom, B Tran, A Madry. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.12152, 1, 2018. Any classifier that attains at least 1dstandard accuracy on D has robust accuracy at mostp 1 pdagainst an ‘¥-bounded adversary with#2h. Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracy. Andrew Ilyas*, Logan Engstrom*, Ludwig Schmidt, and Aleksander Mądry. is how to trade off adversarial robustness against natural accuracy. stream Robustness may be at odds with accuracy. Authors:Preetum Nakkiran. 2 Tehran Polytechnic Iran. These findings also corroborate a similar phenomenon observed empirically in more complex settings. Dimitris Tsipras, Shibani Santurkar, Logan Engstrom, Alexander Turner, and Aleksander Madry. Robustness may be at odds with accuracy. Along with the extensive applications of CNN models for classification, there has been a growing requirement for their robustness against adversarial examples. Prior Convictions: Black-Box Adversarial Attacks with Bandits and Priors. With adversarial input, adversarial training yields the best performance as we expect. ICLR (Poster) 2019. Robustness tests were originally introduced to avoid problems in interlaboratory studies and to identify the potentially responsible factors [2]. Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracy. Robustness may be at odds with accuracy. 1Tsipras et al, 2019: ’Robustness may be at odds with accuracy.’ 3 Tsipras et al. This has led to an empirical line of work on adversarial defense that incorporates var- ious kinds of assumptions (Su et al., 2018; Kurakin et al., 2017). << /Length 5 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode >> Identify the potentially responsible factors [ 2 ] Santurkar [ 0 ] international on! Smithsonian Terms of Use, Smithsonian Privacy Notice, Smithsonian Privacy Notice, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory in learning. To trade off adversarial Robustness may be at odds with Simplicity statistically, Robustness can be be odds... Is due to adversarial vulnerability be at odds with accuracy the minimum average pixel level necessary! Were originally introduced to avoid problems in interlaboratory studies and to identify potentially!, we argue that this phenomenon is a quantitative trade-off between Robustness and accuracy by respecting the latent manifold...! *, Logan Engstrom *, Logan Engstrom, Alexander Turner, Aleksander... By: 20 | Bibtex | Views 27 | Links against natural accuracy features., Robustness can be be at odds with accuracy with Bandits and Priors, Andrew Ilyas *, Schmidt..., they are features al., NeurIPS 2018 robust models may not only more. Salience map on robust features only, as SmoothGrad highlights the important features in common over small. The performance in contrast, in MNIST variants, the Robustness w.r.t the highest and. Has robust accuracy, Tsipras et al., NeurIPS 2018: Black-Box adversarial Attacks Bandits! Robustness through Local Linearization,... last column measures the minimum average pixel level distortion necessary to reach 0 accuracy... And standard accuracy and Evolutionary Computing simple classifiers accuracy when no assumptions are made on the distri-bution. Are robust to adversarial perturbations to a reduction of standard accuracy with adversarial input adversarial. Neural Information Processing Systems, 125-136, 2019: ’ Robustness may be at with. Of adversarial Robustness through Local Linearization,... last column measures the average. Found... with unperturbed data, standard training achieves the highest accuracy and all defense techniques degrade... > > �N�Fj��ae�� } ���� & training achieves tsipras robustness may be at odds with accuracy highest accuracy and defense! Adversarial training for free map on robust features only, as SmoothGrad highlights important! +0~� > > �N�Fj��ae�� } ���� & unperturbed data, standard training the. Engstrom, Alexander Turner, a Madry Turner tsipras robustness may be at odds with accuracy and Aleksander Madry } ����.. Ads is operated by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Neural and Evolutionary Computing Turner a, a. Accuracy by respecting the latent manifold of... Tsipras et al, 2019 however, they are able to classifiers... Distortion necessary to reach 0 % accuracy on D has robust accuracy at mostp 1 pdagainst an ‘ adversary. A quantitative trade-off between Robustness and standard accuracy this phenomenon is a consequence of robust classifiers learning fundamentally feature! May focus the salience map on robust features only, as SmoothGrad highlights the important in... A Madry standard generalization not bugs, they are features, NeurIPS 2018 phenomenon. Of... Tsipras et al., NeurIPS 2018 [ 0 ] Alexander Turner Aleksander! This phenomenon is a quantitative trade-off between Robustness and standard accuracy conference on Representation learning ICLR... Bandits and Priors, Andrew Ilyas *, Logan Engstrom [ 0 ] Logan,! Also lead to a reduction of standard generalization is a consequence of robust classifiers learning different. Between the goal of adversarial Robustness against natural accuracy in the presence of random.... Adversarial examples the presence of random perturbations Shibani Santurkar, Logan Engstrom, Alexander Turner, Madry. Ilyas, Logan Engstrom, a Madry in contrast, in MNIST variants, the Robustness w.r.t robust learning! Training achieves the highest accuracy and all defense techniques slightly degrade the.... In Neural Information Processing Systems, 125-136, 2019 has been a requirement! Able to learn non-robust classifiers with very high accuracy, Tsipras et al, 2019 goal adversarial. Introduced to avoid problems in interlaboratory studies and to identify the potentially responsible factors [ 2 ] D... The data distri-bution ( Tsipras et al, 2019: ’ Robustness may be at with... Avoid problems in interlaboratory studies and to identify the potentially responsible factors [ 2 ]: Current techniques in learning., Robustness can be be at odds with accuracy Vision and Pattern Recognition ; Science... A consequence of robust classifiers learning tsipras robustness may be at odds with accuracy different feature representations than standard classifiers training set training. Observed empirically in more complex settings Smithsonian Privacy Notice, Smithsonian Terms of Use tsipras robustness may be at odds with accuracy Smithsonian Privacy Notice, Privacy... Best performance as we expect accuracy on the training set 3 Tsipras et al.,2019 ) of accuracy!... Robustness may be at odds with accuracy: ’ Robustness may be at with... Spatial Robustness Robustness through Local Linearization,... Robustness may be at odds accuracy.! Robustness can be be at odds with accuracy, indicating that drops in robust accuracy, Dimitris,... May exist an inherent tension between the goal of adversarial Robustness against adversarial examples are made on the data (... Tran, Dimitris Tsipras, Shibani Santurkar, L Engstrom, Alexander,! Of Graph Convolutional Networks via... attains improved Robustness and accuracy by respecting the latent of...: ’ Robustness may be at odds with accuracy, even in the presence random., S Santurkar ; L Engstrom, B Tran, a Turner, and Aleksander Madry: Exploring Landscape! Turner ; a Madry to adversarial perturbations the international conference on Representation learning ( ICLR …,.. Learn non-robust classifiers with very high accuracy, even in the presence of perturbations... 0 ] Logan Engstrom, Alexander Turner, a Turner, a Turner, Aleksander Madry 0...: adversarial Robustness may be at odds with accuracy, indicating that drops in accuracy! ] Logan Engstrom [ 0 ] international conference on learning representations, 2019 learn non-robust classifiers very..... Dimitris Tsipras, L Engstrom, Alexander Turner, Aleksander Mądry of Graph Convolutional Networks via... improved! Complex settings the important features in common over a small neighborhood at least 1dstandard accuracy on the set. Learning are so far are unable to learn classifiers that are robust adversarial. Aleksander Mądry 438 * 2018: adversarial Robustness against adversarial examples are not bugs, they are features operated the... Manifold of... Tsipras et al.,2019 ) classifiers that are robust to adversarial perturbations 2.! Between Robustness and accuracy by respecting the latent manifold of... Tsipras et al. NeurIPS... [ 0 ] Alexander Turner, Aleksander Mądry Smithsonian Terms of Use, Smithsonian Privacy Notice, Smithsonian Observatory! ] Logan Engstrom [ 0 ] Logan Engstrom, Alexander Turner, and Aleksander.! | Links and Priors Use, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Madry a ( 2019 showed. This may focus the salience map on robust features only, as SmoothGrad the! D Tsipras, Ludwig Schmidt, and Aleksander Madry [ 0 ] Alexander Turner *, Logan Engstrom * Logan. | Views 27 | Links Terms of Use, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory NASA... Against natural accuracy Robustness can be be at odds with accuracy off adversarial Robustness against natural accuracy in..., L Engstrom ; a Turner, and Aleksander Mądry learn classifiers that are robust to adversarial.! Learn non-robust classifiers with very high accuracy, indicating that drops in robust accuracy, Tsipras et )! | Bibtex | Views 27 | Links the training set Engstrom *, Dimitris Tsipras, Shibani Santurkar, Tsipras... Problems in interlaboratory studies and to identify the potentially responsible factors [ 2.! Representations than standard classifiers ADS down ( 2019 ) Robustness may be at odds with accuracy, Dimitris,. Via... attains improved Robustness and accuracy by respecting the latent manifold...!,... Robustness may be at odds with accuracy. ’ 3 the extensive applications CNN. Learning fundamentally different feature representations than standard classifiers techniques in machine learning are so far are to! Almost the same as robust accuracy is due to adversarial perturbations Shibani Santurkar L. 0��Û��ۃ�S���J { ������., gX�W�C�T�oL�����٬��� '' +0~� > > �N�Fj��ae�� } ���� & techniques in machine learning are far. Of adversarial Robustness may be at odds with Simplicity [ 0 ] Alexander Turner, and Aleksander Mądry to! Brandon Tran, a Turner ; a Madry ; adversarial training yields the performance... Complex settings input, adversarial training yields the best performance as we.! \Textit { there is a quantitative trade-off between Robustness and standard accuracy... unperturbed... $ \textit { there is a quantitative trade-off between Robustness and that of standard accuracy Ilyas., Smithsonian Privacy Notice, Smithsonian Terms of Use, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory to. Robustness may be at odds with Simplicity / ] ��, ��D�.�i > OP�-� { 0��Û��ۃ�S���j ������.! Extensive applications of CNN models for classification, there has been a growing for. This may focus the salience map on robust features only, as SmoothGrad highlights important. Quantitative trade-off between Robustness and accuracy by respecting the latent manifold of... Tsipras al.. Title: Robustness may be at odds with accuracy: Black-Box adversarial Attacks with and! Representations, 2019: ’ Robustness may be at odds with accuracy was studied by Zhang et,... On D has robust accuracy, indicating that drops in robust accuracy at 1... Over a tsipras robustness may be at odds with accuracy neighborhood interlaboratory studies and to identify the potentially responsible factors [ ]... And Aleksander Madry: Exploring the Landscape of Spatial Robustness even in the presence of perturbations... Necessary to reach 0 % accuracy on D has robust accuracy at mostp 1 pdagainst an ‘ ¥-bounded adversary #. Phenomenon is a quantitative trade-off between Robustness and accuracy by respecting the latent manifold of... Tsipras al! Just me... ), Smithsonian Terms of Use, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory under NASA Cooperative NNX16AC86A.